First of all, I am not a registered voter. I will discuss my reasons for not being registered, as for years voting was a religion to me. My explanation might go a long way to answering why the process is rigged. I must say your answer that Hillary was the Democratic nominee, despite her scandals, goes a long way to pointing out how rigged the system is and why I am not voting at this time.
Your performance in the debate was okay. Clinton can sound very convincing some times and I can see how someone who didn't know better, would vote for her. Just who could, having even a clue how corrupt she has been and probably will continue to be. Lying is a habit for her.
Anyhow, you missed on some things. The most important of which was the WikiLeaks. Hillary threw out the red herring about the Russians being the culprits, with at best evidence that would be thrown out of court, and you bit on her attack. The proper answer would have been, had the leaks come out against you, the media would have beat you to death, even if it came from the devil himself. Where you missed was that no one has dispelled the legitimacy of the emails. There were even emails from the guy who organized the riots at your rally in Chicago. WikiLeaks wouldn't have known that man's name from mine. Point being, there is plenty of important information on who Hillary Clinton really is. That was a fat pitch and you took it and struck out on the one that followed.
Remember, Americans are stupid enough that most of them actually believe you had no taxable income the past 18 years. Unless things have changed, you had to pay tax on your TV show. Maybe there was enough depreciation on your properties, along with property taxes and interest to shelter all the income that came in. I highly doubt this, because a lot of these properties are depreciated out and they are still class A properties. Point being, a carry forward loss is a real loss and to be honest, I thought you were broke at the time. Maybe you were and didn't throw in the towel.
My point on the previous paragraph is the vast majority of people don't know Apple computer borrows money to keep from bringing their cash back to the United States. Most miss the significance of $2.5 trillion coming back to the United States, because they don't understand we get zero taxes out of money the multi-nationals leave off shore. At the same time, the corporate tax rate kills rising small business, just as a billionaire pays at the same bracket as someone making $700,000.
Then there is the deficit. The moderator got away with using a phony figure for the national debt. Hillary got away with stating there is a social security trust fund and the implication Clinton balanced the budget, when in fact that counted extra social security funds. They talked about the improvement in the budget deficit, when in fact, year ending September 30th, Federal debt was $1.4 trillion higher than October 1, 2015. We are already over 100% of GDP in debt, which is considered the point of no return.
A politician should be prohibited in using the term, Social Security Trust Fund. The trust fund has been spent and the only way the fund exists is if the same people pay the taxes again to make it exist. Instead, it is a classic Ponzi scheme and there should never any action taken to recreate the imaginary fund again, lest it be stolen again.
The biggest drain on the middle class of the United States is monetary inflation. Monetary inflation is debt inflation and the illusion is money is easy to pay back and wages are going up. It drains savings and devalues capital. The only beneficiaries are the rich, who have first access to the money and government bureaucrats. They can indebt the people painlessly, only to spring the debt on them later.
The Clintons claim the 1990's. The 1990's were a debt bubble and the country was funded on home equity, hidden because declining interest rates inflated values. Franklin Raines, a Clinton cabinet member, created the almost no down payment standards on FNMA loans, then took over FNMA to finish the bubble and draw out $100 million in compensation. Raines gave us a bankrupt FNMA and Barack Obama. The middle class is either renting now or stuck in mortgaged up homes. Artificially low rates are going to take the rest of the equity this time around.
We all know what happened to the stock market in 2000 to 2002. This bubble was fueled by hype and money withdrawn from the housing stock of the American people. The 401K's were making people rich and providing money for the bubble, only for it to disappear in worthless stocks, hyped by analysts who never saw a sell recommendation. Wall Street got fat and many retirement funds were left holding huge cap value stocks like Enron and WorldCom. The highest value stocks at the time, Microsoft, Intel, GE and Cisco have yet to make it back to their 2001 tops nearly 16 years later. These 4 stocks made up over 1/8 of total market capitalization and were universally held in excess in mutual funds.
Where the American people are fooled is inflation helps the rich, bails out the bankers, who operate a Ponzi of their own and devalue the assets of the middle class. Capital gains are only for quick money, as over time, most capital gains are noting but devaluation of the money and no gain at all. I don't think it would be too bad if capital gains were taxed at full income amounts, as long as the basis was indexed to inflation.
The other thing that fools most people is there is nothing free. In fact, the cost of government falls directly on the people that work for a living. You can tax the excess of the rich, but you can't gain by taxing capital over time. That is because capital provides the basis of a rising standard of living. Government produces nothing. It does provide services, but in sum, those services are derived from the people that work outside the government. The term GDP means nothing, when the measuring stick means nothing and so much of it is fluff. A few intellectuals position themselves to convince the rest of us they know more about our business than we do. This is why central planning doesn't work.
My other reason for not voting is philosophical. I am a Rothbard leaning Libertarian. Gary Johnson is just another statist, a guy that held office all his life. A self respecting Libertarian wouldn't touch him with a 10 foot pole. The most powerful government for a libertarian would be at city hall, where we could get our hands on them. DC would amount to next to nothing, maybe 5% the size it is today.
As to why I don't vote? I had a hell of a time not registering this time to vote for you. You get elected and run again, I will probably get in line. But, you aren't supposed to be on the ticket, which is why it is rigged. I don't believe the press is as rigged as it has been this time around. I think they just happen to work for those that usually pick the candidates. As you like to point out, your movement is an anomaly. It is, because you aren't supposed to get the nomination. In fact, George Washington,, Abe Lincoln, Andrew Jackson or Thomas Jefferson would have almost no chance of running for President today, unless they sold out. I quit voting in 1994, when I realized they were going to make the second George Bush President after Clinton. I was right and there is no way in hell George should have been within 200 yards of the White House. The same goes for his father and the Clintons. Reagan was said to be an anomaly, but Reagan was just another establishment guy who happened to be on the opposite end of the spectrum. He worked for General Electric when he did Death Valley Days. He didn't fall out of the sky to be the speaker at the RNC in 1964. His administration was dominated by Rockefeller men, just as Carter and Nixon's was.
If you get elected, it will be the greatest political event in my lifetime. The establishment will have been defeated, at least temporarily. I'm sure you have been close enough to politics that you couldn't see what I have been able to see, standing back. Just as I did years ago, I'm sure you are getting a big dose today. You aren't supposed to be the nominee. Anyone in their right mind knows Hillary isn't supposed to be there, in reality, but American politics is a stage show. Nor was Romney or McCain the best men for the job, but stand ups for Obama, who raised a huge war chest from Wall Street in 2008 and paid his dues by putting none of them in jail for the massive fraud that led to the breaking bubble. Not to mention he kept Bernanke in power, giving them fuel to pile up even more wealth on leverage that cost nothing. Then there was Bob Dole in 1996, when Clinton would have been easy to defeat. Why such a dull candidate, when the Republicans had a winner in 96? Same with Dukakis in 1988. At least the Democrats ran Mondale in 1984, who had the appearance of being legitimate.
I respect you DJT. Any man who could take the shit dished out the last year and still be moving forward with hope, is a real man. I'm going to send you a little money, just as I sent Ron Paul money and Rand Paul money. It is too bad you were so naïve as to think we had legitimate elections in the US. It has little to do with capability or honesty and a lot to do with who with money and power puts up. Both the nominees are supposed to be their guys.
The executive branch of government was never supposed to be this powerful. What scares me about Hillary or, if not Hillary, the next guy or woman, is that we are just a step away from being a dictatorship. The average Joe wouldn't know one if they saw it, until is started acting as a dictatorship. We are already there, as Congress has declared too many wars on the domestic front and woven too much Federal funding through the states. This is where we get ridiculous stuff like allowing transvestites in with our daughters at school. No one in their right mind would make such a ruling, other than someone who is seeing how much the people of a country will take. As you can see, we are already there. Executive orders are orders of war.
The US was set up as a mercantile system and we were told it was free enterprise. It is, where they aren't involved. That area is getting more narrow all the time. They get bailed out, we get regulated. There are no regulations that either fail to provide the oligarchs with more money or eliminate their competition. If it hits them too hard, they go to China.
Wednesday, October 19, 2016
Thursday, October 13, 2016
Right Wing Conspiracy
There are really only 3 types of societies in the world, tribalism, socialism and classical liberalism. Classical liberalism is not to be confused with what they call liberal in the US and around the world, but instead a system of free enterprise, minimal government intrusion, little or no redistribution of wealth.
Tribalism is what you make of it. It could be socialistic or classical liberal. Socialism is another animal. There are 2 general types of socialism, communism on the left and Fabian socialism on the right. Fabian socialism either is or is closely aligned with fascism. Fascism is national socialism, the kind preached by Obama and for the most part, both parties of the US government. One party merely wants to go faster toward state ownership of much of the means of production and economy the other.
There is almost no true left wing socialism with any power in the United States. Instead, we have 2 parties that are much closer to the fascist model, right wing. The model is called the corporate state. The left is right and the right is just less right.
How strong is the system? Watch the election. There is no free mainstream press in the United States. It is all geared to support the fascist, international domination line. There is no one on the scene more prepared to go down this line than Hillary Clinton, even if it ends up bankrupting the United States and draining it of what was once a massive amount of accumulated capital. The point is to keep those in charge that are in charge, because this is the very means of support and the continuation of such system. The problem is, it eventually goes bankrupt. The globalists don't care, because they have their nests feathered and can live where they wish.
Trump is no classical liberal, that is certain. All one has to do is listen. But, it is clear that he has a plan for the country and not for the globalist multinational corporations and international bankers. Clinton, on the other hand, seems to be interested in selling out the United States, giving the people the typical bones that fascists throw them. We are going to get rid of greenhouse gasses, a fascist conspiracy, in the first place. The little guy just won't have a car, while the globalist flies in a private jet and rides in a limousine. Less demand for oil and gas will merely conserve more of this resource for them, while their taxes are merely recycled back to them.
One only need watch the debate Monday to witness how the conspiracy works. Anderson Cooper made certain to nail Trump down on whether he had groped any women. This whole matter had been constructed out of Trumps boasting of his celebrity on that tape. The entire Clinton structure is in the corporate press. It has to be, as Trump would really make a mess of their plans of draining the US so they can build up their worldwide interests. It takes all of 3 days to pull up some women that claim Trump molested them. The entire matter was lined out so Hillary can run out the clock on what will be the greatest right wing scam since the election of Woodrow Wilson.
One must look at how easy a target Donald Trump is in this matter. Who is he? Probably the most celebrity rich guy in the United States. The number of women that would sleep with him, merely on invite stretches in the tens of millions. The number of women he has probably hugged in some fashion is in the tens of thousands. The nature of his business and celebrity brings him into contact with many.
If Trump groped the 4 women, he has probably groped thousands. Where have they been all these years? He has been in the celebrity class for the past 35 years. One for every 9 years doesn't fit the model. Where are his yard children? Sex for a middle class decent looking male isn't hard to find. Women can get it on demand, provided they are average or better. A man of Trump's status doesn't need to grope women. He merely needs to ask them. The evidence against him is sketchy at best.
Then we must turn to the women themselves. As public a figure as Trump has been, the chances he has had close contact with the mere public percentage of mentally ill people would definitely raise the odds of imaginary molesting of hundreds of women. If there were 100 women that even thought Trump groped them, that wouldn't be shocking. 25% of American women are taking psychiatric drugs, at least that is what I have read. For what? The doctor thought something was going on between the ears. There is a lot of projection, where people project onto others what they want.
The point of all of this isn't to argue whether Trump is guilty or not. The point is to look at the coverage in the press. Hillary has more fires blazing around her than Smoky the Bear. They don't look. The Obama Administration is unequally prosecuting people in the US. They don't look. Hillary blames everything on the Russians, when in fact the WikiLeaks are the writings of her and her associates. The Clinton's now claim a $250 million net worth, though neither has had much of a private sector job. Clearly they are selling influence or collecting for past favors. The big press isn't even looking at these matters.
The question here is whether there is still a we the people in the US or merely a group of people dependent on what their masters will let them have. It is clear there is a fascist power structure in the US that protects itself, spins the information Americans are allowed to have and wants to control them to the hilt. They need politicians that will continue the status quo, because to interrupt it, everything falls apart.
Trump has seen this go on for years and thought he could do something about it, because he believed the fable that the US is a free society with free elections. Much of the American population has believed the same, that they could choose their leaders, when in fact, we have been voting for a group of cardboard cutouts, anyone not in the mold, eliminated by the right socialist press. What is guaranteed for average Americans is a declining standard of living and a continued theft of the rights guaranteed in the bill of rights. The current structure either violates or has eliminated much of them already. Remember, they are your rights not the governments.
Tribalism is what you make of it. It could be socialistic or classical liberal. Socialism is another animal. There are 2 general types of socialism, communism on the left and Fabian socialism on the right. Fabian socialism either is or is closely aligned with fascism. Fascism is national socialism, the kind preached by Obama and for the most part, both parties of the US government. One party merely wants to go faster toward state ownership of much of the means of production and economy the other.
There is almost no true left wing socialism with any power in the United States. Instead, we have 2 parties that are much closer to the fascist model, right wing. The model is called the corporate state. The left is right and the right is just less right.
How strong is the system? Watch the election. There is no free mainstream press in the United States. It is all geared to support the fascist, international domination line. There is no one on the scene more prepared to go down this line than Hillary Clinton, even if it ends up bankrupting the United States and draining it of what was once a massive amount of accumulated capital. The point is to keep those in charge that are in charge, because this is the very means of support and the continuation of such system. The problem is, it eventually goes bankrupt. The globalists don't care, because they have their nests feathered and can live where they wish.
Trump is no classical liberal, that is certain. All one has to do is listen. But, it is clear that he has a plan for the country and not for the globalist multinational corporations and international bankers. Clinton, on the other hand, seems to be interested in selling out the United States, giving the people the typical bones that fascists throw them. We are going to get rid of greenhouse gasses, a fascist conspiracy, in the first place. The little guy just won't have a car, while the globalist flies in a private jet and rides in a limousine. Less demand for oil and gas will merely conserve more of this resource for them, while their taxes are merely recycled back to them.
One only need watch the debate Monday to witness how the conspiracy works. Anderson Cooper made certain to nail Trump down on whether he had groped any women. This whole matter had been constructed out of Trumps boasting of his celebrity on that tape. The entire Clinton structure is in the corporate press. It has to be, as Trump would really make a mess of their plans of draining the US so they can build up their worldwide interests. It takes all of 3 days to pull up some women that claim Trump molested them. The entire matter was lined out so Hillary can run out the clock on what will be the greatest right wing scam since the election of Woodrow Wilson.
One must look at how easy a target Donald Trump is in this matter. Who is he? Probably the most celebrity rich guy in the United States. The number of women that would sleep with him, merely on invite stretches in the tens of millions. The number of women he has probably hugged in some fashion is in the tens of thousands. The nature of his business and celebrity brings him into contact with many.
If Trump groped the 4 women, he has probably groped thousands. Where have they been all these years? He has been in the celebrity class for the past 35 years. One for every 9 years doesn't fit the model. Where are his yard children? Sex for a middle class decent looking male isn't hard to find. Women can get it on demand, provided they are average or better. A man of Trump's status doesn't need to grope women. He merely needs to ask them. The evidence against him is sketchy at best.
Then we must turn to the women themselves. As public a figure as Trump has been, the chances he has had close contact with the mere public percentage of mentally ill people would definitely raise the odds of imaginary molesting of hundreds of women. If there were 100 women that even thought Trump groped them, that wouldn't be shocking. 25% of American women are taking psychiatric drugs, at least that is what I have read. For what? The doctor thought something was going on between the ears. There is a lot of projection, where people project onto others what they want.
The point of all of this isn't to argue whether Trump is guilty or not. The point is to look at the coverage in the press. Hillary has more fires blazing around her than Smoky the Bear. They don't look. The Obama Administration is unequally prosecuting people in the US. They don't look. Hillary blames everything on the Russians, when in fact the WikiLeaks are the writings of her and her associates. The Clinton's now claim a $250 million net worth, though neither has had much of a private sector job. Clearly they are selling influence or collecting for past favors. The big press isn't even looking at these matters.
The question here is whether there is still a we the people in the US or merely a group of people dependent on what their masters will let them have. It is clear there is a fascist power structure in the US that protects itself, spins the information Americans are allowed to have and wants to control them to the hilt. They need politicians that will continue the status quo, because to interrupt it, everything falls apart.
Trump has seen this go on for years and thought he could do something about it, because he believed the fable that the US is a free society with free elections. Much of the American population has believed the same, that they could choose their leaders, when in fact, we have been voting for a group of cardboard cutouts, anyone not in the mold, eliminated by the right socialist press. What is guaranteed for average Americans is a declining standard of living and a continued theft of the rights guaranteed in the bill of rights. The current structure either violates or has eliminated much of them already. Remember, they are your rights not the governments.
Wednesday, October 12, 2016
Stood Up
There is a popular British series called Peaky Blinders. In it, they hire a kid to get thrown in jail to appease the authorities. They call it "stood up". The kid was paid well and all was well, except the organized crime opponents of the Blinders killed him.
Stood up meant there was a purpose for the authorities and the criminal element involved. In the case of the Blinders, they needed an arrest of a bookie, a phony at that, to get the cops off their real bookies. In the case of the police, they needed an arrest to show the government that was demanding action, they were doing their job.
Such is the current political climate. In fact, we have been voting for stood up candidates for President most, if not all my life. The only exceptions I can think of are Trump and maybe Reagan. But, Reagan was a political figure, brought into the mix at the Republican Convention of 1964. Sometimes we have 2 viable establishment characters, so the puppeteers can't lose. Other times, we have basically a dummy to face their man in power. An example was Dole in 1996, when it would have been easy for the Republicans to dust off a new face and beat Clinton in 1996. Dole was in the same pockets that Clinton was in, thus making it a safe bet.
I made a decision to quit voting in 1994 and despite my strongest urges to register and vote against Hillary, I haven't done so. My reasoning at the time was they were going to make the second Bush the President of the United States, when they stood him up as Governor of Texas. 2000 confirmed my suspicions. It was either 2002 or 2004 that Obama was elected to the Senate. Immediately, he was being touted as a Presidential candidate, the first black President. It only took 4 years, despite Obama doing nothing to distinguish himself in the Senate. The timing of his election, the financial crisis, along with the massive campaign war chest he had, tells a story. Afterwards, there was very little in criminal prosecution of the sins of Wall Street and some of the main characters involved were brought into his government.
McCain was also a stood up character. One of the Keeting 5, McCain was certain to be friendly to the bankers. Then we have the capital firm character, Mitt Romney. What an insider and what an easy target for Obama. Was the plan to elect Obama or to have 2 candidates in the pocket of the establishment?
This brings us to Hillary Clinton. What has Hillary done? Next to nothing, but she was touted 25 years ago, as the first woman President. She had worked in a law firm a few years, her practice tinged with corruption. Other than that, her claim to fame was she was married to a politician. Someone decided she would be Senator of a state, where she hadn't resided in over 25 years. Broke, according to her story, she buys a mansion. The state, New York, is ruled by bankers. Presto.
If we the people understood what was going on, Donald Trump would win this election by 50 points. I'm not going to say Trump has all the great ideas, but for the first time in a long time, likely in my lifetime, we have a man that isn't owned by the same powerful international groups. His opponent is tainted with more scandals and corruption than possibly any character who has ever run for any national office. The actions of the establishment against Trump model the actions of a totalitarian state.
The current controversy is about something Trump said on an open mike while riding in a bus with other celebrities. The establishment had this on the shelves to release at an appropriate time. What time? When all the damning facts about his opponent comes out. We saw this when the Obama phony, doctored birth certificate was released. Suddenly they kill Bin Laden. The WikiLeaks releases confirm Hillary is a 2 faced liar, who doesn't work for the people, doesn't unite the people, but uses divisive tactics that may or may not be her actual opinion. She peddles influence to the few, using the many to get into power, effectively destroying the middle class. The establishment doesn't care about us. They care about having someone in power that will spread their influence and pad their pockets. The American people are pawns to keep them in power.
Trump was actually telling it as it is. He never admitted to grabbing pussy, only that he could do it, if he wanted in a lot of cases. Is it true? There are women that don't care who they sleep with, as long as there is status in doing so. The NBA teams travel around the country. Women hang out to get someone of note as a notch on their gun. Some of these guys end up paying child support to women they don't know. You hear about it all the time.
WikiLeaks comes out with all the dirt on Hillary (their emails, not some rumor) and here this off color interview of Donald Trump telling it like it is. The press can't talk about how Hillary looks at the typical American as a pawn or how she despises us. No it is about Trump telling it as it is, likely having fun behind closed doors in telling it. Locker room talk, as in the 19th hole locker room.
How many women has Donald Trump met that would go to great lengths to have him show sexual interest toward them? Probably 100,000 or more. Wilt Chamberlain claimed to have had sex with something like 5000 women. Think he got all of them that were available? They were lying in wait for him, if this was true. That is 1 a week for 100 years and Wilt probably did it in 35 years or less. He wasn't going out on dates with these gals, as Wilt was a bachelor his entire life and not even Wilt could handle that stream of women. I never heard any rumors of rape against Wilt. Think Wilt didn't grab a lot of pussy? He was black and he was an icon. He was also a notch on thousands of women's guns.
So, the mainstream media plays these comments over and over again, while emails showing what a group of thugs are managing the Democratic Party candidate. Hillary Clinton is a criminal. Not only is she guilty of violating the espionage act, but there is massive evidence of the peddling of influence. The Feds go after local authorities engaged in minor violations, while Hillary pockets tens of millions, then runs for President. That, with the mainstream media aiding and abetting her along the way.
Why? Trump is the first candidate for President that the people of the United States selected, in my lifetime. The Republican establishment fought him. The Democrats demonize him, yet is he likely closer to the blacks, Hispanics and whites of the US than Hillary ever was. His views on illegal immigration is twisted to mean he hates Mexicans, while the Americans of lower economic status are priced out of the market, social systems are financially strained and the country bears a cost. Trump has come out for the United States and its people. The establishment is fighting him, because they want to get rid of the United States as we know it and use the world as their source of more power.
So, we are looking at a cardboard cutout in Hillary and the people's choice in Trump. The establishment candidate can be whomever they like, as they are in the habit of controlling both candidates. Mickey Mouse could be on the ticket, as long as the administration behind him was composed of establishment, Goldman Sachs types. This is what we will get with Hillary, more characters selling the common man and women of the United States down the river, under the guise of diversity and nation building.
As for me? I resisted the urge to register to vote once more. Maybe one day I will get involved with local issues and register. If Texas isn't a safe state for Trump, my vote wouldn't matter, as the establishment would have succeeded in pulling the wool over the sheeples eyes once more. The United States has been destroyed by these people and we are seeing a last gasp effort by a movement to save what is left. Our debt and our working class is being used as collateral to further the aims of the multinationals and globalists. Even the poorest American couldn't stand what is on its way, if we don't reverse this collateralization of America for international purposes. In the meantime, the current administration is pushing us toward world war, likely to cloud the issue of impending financial collapse. The main players are going to need a place to hide and Hillary will give it to them, in exchange for a little fame, fortune and power. Our industry is gone and the debts are piling up. We the people are a dead issue, if we the people elect Hillary. Elect our candidate, not theirs.
Stood up meant there was a purpose for the authorities and the criminal element involved. In the case of the Blinders, they needed an arrest of a bookie, a phony at that, to get the cops off their real bookies. In the case of the police, they needed an arrest to show the government that was demanding action, they were doing their job.
Such is the current political climate. In fact, we have been voting for stood up candidates for President most, if not all my life. The only exceptions I can think of are Trump and maybe Reagan. But, Reagan was a political figure, brought into the mix at the Republican Convention of 1964. Sometimes we have 2 viable establishment characters, so the puppeteers can't lose. Other times, we have basically a dummy to face their man in power. An example was Dole in 1996, when it would have been easy for the Republicans to dust off a new face and beat Clinton in 1996. Dole was in the same pockets that Clinton was in, thus making it a safe bet.
I made a decision to quit voting in 1994 and despite my strongest urges to register and vote against Hillary, I haven't done so. My reasoning at the time was they were going to make the second Bush the President of the United States, when they stood him up as Governor of Texas. 2000 confirmed my suspicions. It was either 2002 or 2004 that Obama was elected to the Senate. Immediately, he was being touted as a Presidential candidate, the first black President. It only took 4 years, despite Obama doing nothing to distinguish himself in the Senate. The timing of his election, the financial crisis, along with the massive campaign war chest he had, tells a story. Afterwards, there was very little in criminal prosecution of the sins of Wall Street and some of the main characters involved were brought into his government.
McCain was also a stood up character. One of the Keeting 5, McCain was certain to be friendly to the bankers. Then we have the capital firm character, Mitt Romney. What an insider and what an easy target for Obama. Was the plan to elect Obama or to have 2 candidates in the pocket of the establishment?
This brings us to Hillary Clinton. What has Hillary done? Next to nothing, but she was touted 25 years ago, as the first woman President. She had worked in a law firm a few years, her practice tinged with corruption. Other than that, her claim to fame was she was married to a politician. Someone decided she would be Senator of a state, where she hadn't resided in over 25 years. Broke, according to her story, she buys a mansion. The state, New York, is ruled by bankers. Presto.
If we the people understood what was going on, Donald Trump would win this election by 50 points. I'm not going to say Trump has all the great ideas, but for the first time in a long time, likely in my lifetime, we have a man that isn't owned by the same powerful international groups. His opponent is tainted with more scandals and corruption than possibly any character who has ever run for any national office. The actions of the establishment against Trump model the actions of a totalitarian state.
The current controversy is about something Trump said on an open mike while riding in a bus with other celebrities. The establishment had this on the shelves to release at an appropriate time. What time? When all the damning facts about his opponent comes out. We saw this when the Obama phony, doctored birth certificate was released. Suddenly they kill Bin Laden. The WikiLeaks releases confirm Hillary is a 2 faced liar, who doesn't work for the people, doesn't unite the people, but uses divisive tactics that may or may not be her actual opinion. She peddles influence to the few, using the many to get into power, effectively destroying the middle class. The establishment doesn't care about us. They care about having someone in power that will spread their influence and pad their pockets. The American people are pawns to keep them in power.
Trump was actually telling it as it is. He never admitted to grabbing pussy, only that he could do it, if he wanted in a lot of cases. Is it true? There are women that don't care who they sleep with, as long as there is status in doing so. The NBA teams travel around the country. Women hang out to get someone of note as a notch on their gun. Some of these guys end up paying child support to women they don't know. You hear about it all the time.
WikiLeaks comes out with all the dirt on Hillary (their emails, not some rumor) and here this off color interview of Donald Trump telling it like it is. The press can't talk about how Hillary looks at the typical American as a pawn or how she despises us. No it is about Trump telling it as it is, likely having fun behind closed doors in telling it. Locker room talk, as in the 19th hole locker room.
How many women has Donald Trump met that would go to great lengths to have him show sexual interest toward them? Probably 100,000 or more. Wilt Chamberlain claimed to have had sex with something like 5000 women. Think he got all of them that were available? They were lying in wait for him, if this was true. That is 1 a week for 100 years and Wilt probably did it in 35 years or less. He wasn't going out on dates with these gals, as Wilt was a bachelor his entire life and not even Wilt could handle that stream of women. I never heard any rumors of rape against Wilt. Think Wilt didn't grab a lot of pussy? He was black and he was an icon. He was also a notch on thousands of women's guns.
So, the mainstream media plays these comments over and over again, while emails showing what a group of thugs are managing the Democratic Party candidate. Hillary Clinton is a criminal. Not only is she guilty of violating the espionage act, but there is massive evidence of the peddling of influence. The Feds go after local authorities engaged in minor violations, while Hillary pockets tens of millions, then runs for President. That, with the mainstream media aiding and abetting her along the way.
Why? Trump is the first candidate for President that the people of the United States selected, in my lifetime. The Republican establishment fought him. The Democrats demonize him, yet is he likely closer to the blacks, Hispanics and whites of the US than Hillary ever was. His views on illegal immigration is twisted to mean he hates Mexicans, while the Americans of lower economic status are priced out of the market, social systems are financially strained and the country bears a cost. Trump has come out for the United States and its people. The establishment is fighting him, because they want to get rid of the United States as we know it and use the world as their source of more power.
So, we are looking at a cardboard cutout in Hillary and the people's choice in Trump. The establishment candidate can be whomever they like, as they are in the habit of controlling both candidates. Mickey Mouse could be on the ticket, as long as the administration behind him was composed of establishment, Goldman Sachs types. This is what we will get with Hillary, more characters selling the common man and women of the United States down the river, under the guise of diversity and nation building.
As for me? I resisted the urge to register to vote once more. Maybe one day I will get involved with local issues and register. If Texas isn't a safe state for Trump, my vote wouldn't matter, as the establishment would have succeeded in pulling the wool over the sheeples eyes once more. The United States has been destroyed by these people and we are seeing a last gasp effort by a movement to save what is left. Our debt and our working class is being used as collateral to further the aims of the multinationals and globalists. Even the poorest American couldn't stand what is on its way, if we don't reverse this collateralization of America for international purposes. In the meantime, the current administration is pushing us toward world war, likely to cloud the issue of impending financial collapse. The main players are going to need a place to hide and Hillary will give it to them, in exchange for a little fame, fortune and power. Our industry is gone and the debts are piling up. We the people are a dead issue, if we the people elect Hillary. Elect our candidate, not theirs.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)